Since SONAR Platinum we actually stopped doing 'new' products as opposed to a rolling updates timeline. We've added tons of new features over the year that fully justify calling it a new product release. Due to the volume of fixes recently it might look like we've been only doing maintenance but that isn't accurate. In case you hadn't seen it here is a link to all the new features that we've done in CbB. I fully appreciate the logistics of balancing editorial content with readership metrics Hi Tubbs nice to see you here and thanks for SOS's support for Cakewalk over the years! Thanks for your insights. Until there is something good to review more than stability fixes and ergonomics, any review would simply be plowing the same writing on an iPad precludes a lot of easy editing, as you can tell from the copy.

If bandlab releases new products they’ll get reviewed. So any conspiracy theories about payola is a an idiotic trope. It is the same for any review writing, be it daws or cars or better home and gardens. That is how things work, not slipping money no one has under the table so a pet writer can waste their time trying to turn lead to gold. If too many readers buy crap because of lies, guess what, they don’t buy your mag and your ad rates go down. That doesn’t mean they will say 2+2= 5 or this $5 pre is a neve etc.

But it it hard to write a new car review if all they’ve done is add new tires to last years model, no matter how smoothly it now rides.Īnd as for the old complaint about money buying reviews, any publisher will look to review new products from advertisers. If rapture pro 2 was released, or boardwalk by bandlab with large additions, the magazines would run reviews. That was the last big news to hang any writing on, and the last cake review I know of was in tape op talking about just that. But there is nothing new to review, really, since bandlab bought out the software. Sound on sound has done plenty of reviews of cake software.

Review cakewalk by bandlab